Agentic intelligence for drug development.

From evidence to progress.

For discovery and preclinical teams that want every agent proposal cited, reviewed and decided by a named person.

Trovensa is being designed to connect scientific evidence, research workflows, and the decisions that advance drug-development programs.

Preview Private preview for design partners. The console, Evidence, Plans and Review are in preview; Progress is in preview; clinical and manufacturing objects are designed. Not generally available. Status as of 2026-09-15.

Console build, illustrative data
The console: a thread with an approved plan card, a write proposal naming the permission evidence.findings.manage, and the run rail paused, waiting for a decision. Development build with illustrative data.
  1. The plan card: actions, tools, sources and expected writes, approved before anything runs.
  2. A write proposal naming the permission it needs, evidence.findings.manage, with its citations.
  3. The run rail reads "Paused, waiting for a decision" until a named person decides.

Captured 2026-09-15 from build e456d2d.

The problem

Context is lost in the handoffs.

Research moves through many sources, tools and reviews. Important information sits across publications, electronic lab notebooks, protocols, research reports and specialised software, and the context between them is lost in handoffs.

Trovensa is the record of what agents proposed and what people decided, built for drug-development programs.

Illustrative
Illustrative program TRV-101 · Preclinical development · Private threadIllustrative
  1. Private to you. Quality reviewers and program leads can read this thread for review.
  2. Scientist

    What is known about liver findings for compounds hitting this target in rodents? Prefer primary sources from the last five years.

  3. Plan (proposed)

    Search open literature sources; fetch open-access full text where the licence allows; compare with the two findings already on Q-12; propose findings and gaps. No record writes until approved.

    Approve planEditDecline
  4. Write proposal

    Create finding F-31 (observation) on Q-12, citing [1] and [4]. Permission exercised: evidence.findings.manage.

    ApproveEdit then approveDecline with a reason
Write proposal pending. Nothing is written until a named person decides.Illustrative thread

The console

Ask in plain words. See the plan. Decide each write.

Preview In preview; not generally available. Status as of 2026-09-15.

  • Every proposal cites its sources.
  • Every write pauses for a named person.
  • Every decision leaves a signed record with a stated meaning.

Every decision stays human and recorded. Timing claims wait for measured data.

How the console works

Four stages inside

One program, from discovery to manufacturing planning.

Four products, three pillars, four stages. The stages are the lifecycle; the pillars are how the work is packaged. Every product serves every stage.

  1. 01

    Discovery

    Turn a question into evidence-supported next steps.

  2. 02

    Preclinical development

    Keep the plan, the protocol, the data and the interpretation connected.

  3. 03

    Clinical development

    Review records against approved procedures, with the source in view.

  4. 04

    Manufacturing planning

    See the program as one connected picture.

The record

Every decision leaves a record you can read later.

Three of the record shapes a quality process would ask for first, as field names. The security page carries the full set.

See every record

Next step

Talk to us about a private preview.

We are opening a private preview for design partners, positioned as non-GxP decision support with a light validation package.

Claims discipline

What we do and do not claim.

Trovensa would assist the people who run a program; it does not claim to validate a therapy, authorise its use or guarantee successful development.

Read the prefer and avoid table